.

Hemy Neuman Trial - Defense Rests its Case

"I will not be testifying." - Hemy Neuman

Defense attorneys in the Hemy Neuman murder trial rested their case Thursday after calling two forensic psychiatrists to the stand to testify that Neuman was legally insane the day he killed Russell "Rusty" Sneiderman.

Before the defense closed, Judge Gregory Adams gave Neuman what might be his last chance to take the stand and defend himself in the case that could send him to prison for the rest of his life.

"I will not be testifying," a soft-spoken Neuman told the judge.

"He did not see this as murder. He saw it as a mission."

The prosecution, led by prosecutor Don Geary and DeKalb County District Attorney Robert James, contend that Neuman is faking mental illness.

Neuman is charged in the death of Sneiderman, who was gunned down in Nov. 2012 after dropping his child off at a Dunwoody daycare center. He has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity.

Much of Thursday was taken up with defense attorney Bob Rubin and Geary questioning defense witness Dr. Tracey Marks. She is one of the two experts who diagnosed Neuman as mentally ill, suffering from bipolar disorder with psychosis. Marks said that means Neuman couldn't tell the difference between right and wrong.

Geary pressed Marks on whether she could have been duped into thinking Neuman was delusional.

"He did not see this as murder," Marks told the jury. "He saw it as a mission."

Neuman has told defense psychiatrists that he saw a demon and an angel who urged him to kill Sneiderman to protect the  Sneiderman's two young children. The defense argues that Neuman believed the angel told him that the Sneiderman children were in fact his own biological children.

But Geary argued that Neuman must have known it was wrong to kill because he lied to the police, wore a disguise to the crime scene, and threw the gun into a lake after the shooting.

Both the defense and prosecution contend that Neuman, a former manager at GE Energy, was having a workplace affair with Andrea Sneiderman. Neuman was her boss. She denies having an affair with him.

But Neuman was driven to kill by a "rescue fantasy." Marks told the jury. She said that meant he thought he had to protect the Sneiderman children at all costs from growing up in an abusive household like he did.

"There is no evidence that Rusty was harming the kids, but that's what makes this a delusion," Marks said.

Geary asked if it was possible that Neuman was lying about the delusion. Marks answered, "It's always possible."

The prosecution also called into question the amount of work the doctor did to form her opinion - reviewing about 100 documents from 8,000 pages of evidence and spending 7 hours in interviews and tests with Neuman.

"If there was in fact, no depression, that he made it up, would that change your opinion?" Geary asked.

"Maybe, maybe not," she replied.

Finally, asked, "Is it possible that someone has fooled you by lying?"

"Yes, it's possible," she said.

Defense's Rubin countered by asking Marks if the prosecution had brought up any solid evidence that would make her change her diagnosis right. But she stuck to her assessment.

"This is my opinion,” she testified. “It's up to the jury to decide."

After the defense rested its case, the prosecution began its rebuttal by calling forensic psychologist Dr. Pamela Crawford, who is expected to testify that Neuman is faking mental illness.

It's not clear how long prosecution’s rebuttal will last, or who will be called.

Court resumes at 9 a.m. Friday.

Readers, you can catch up with previous days' coverage in our special section on the case.

And for those of you coming to us on a mobile device, here's an RSS feed where you can review today's live blog.

Jimmie March 09, 2012 at 12:36 PM
Why is that bow-tie lawyers always defend the scum of the earth?
Jane Stewart March 09, 2012 at 12:49 PM
I can't watch this anymore. This is so sad for the Sneiderman family. This trial makes a mockery of our judicial system. I understand that Neuman is guaranteed a right to a fair trial, but this 'insanity' plea stretches the boundaries and insults the true victims. How dare he bring the Holocaust into this as some kind of 'excuse'. How dare he spend every last dime of his family's money defending the (admitted) fact that he stood in front of another human being - a very good person by all accounts - and shot him four times in the hope of stealing his wife and his lifestyle. This trial has become a circus and I am now choosing to turn away. This kind of pursuit of 'justice' is a waste of time and money and is simply more torture for the victim's family.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »